Dunno, I couldn't find a mention of licencing the specific copy of the game. Since there's no ownership, and digital copies are inherently exact, a licence to play a game can mean just that, like licencing a trademark. I haven't heard of a country where EULAs are upheld, but that is a questionable thing. If someone proves it's illegal in any specific country, I'll just claim moral rights anyway.Jaedar wrote:Pretty sure the license you buy is for the specific copy of the game, not any one copy. And making backups is often expressivly forbidden under the EULA(the case of whether or not the EULA is legally binding is a whole other topic though). Personally I think all laws regarding software could use some rethinking
Some court cases made the situation the same here for music, but it's fairly untested. Our legal system is more lenient in copyright cases than the USA, and copyright owners are reluctant to provide test cases that could backfire. In the meantime, they focus on lobbying politicians and providing potential legislation.Dragon wrote:Or you live in the right country. In my country "downloading" games is not illegal as long as it is for your personal use only. Only "uploading" games is illegal.
---
I read the review. It was hard to read, more about the reviewer than the game. It sounded like it could be fair. Based on the criticisms, if people want and manage to mod the game, maybe it could turn out well. Missing textures could be filled in, and bad decisions omitted -- a more expansive and intricate modern Deus Ex engine&maps, with the vomit cleaned up.
Not sure about the ending. If I was writing the story, there'd be a big blowup including Jensen that hits the news. The public backlash outlaws modifications, excepting for the highest authorities (eg. national defense). To do that though, the developers would have had to contrast how Jordan O'Shea and Jojo Fine were modified.