It is currently Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:34 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properties? 
Author Message
UNATCO
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:54 pm
Posts: 214
Post Re: Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properti
No, because It's quite capable of expelling plasma into your face and overheating when used carelessly, I think you should make a failsafe in that WeaponPlasmaRifle.u In GMDX, if it's used continuously, It will kinda overheat, also there should be a blast when using the secondary fire too much

_________________
Being a soldier isn't just following orders, it's following those orders in the service of a higher cause. When that cause is betrayed, we're not soldiers anymore, just pieces on a chess board dying for the wrong reason.


Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:29 am
Profile
Illuminati

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:21 am
Posts: 2283
Post Re: Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properti
I didn't mean necessary in that context. The plasma rifle IS an experimental weapon, but is it absolutely necessary to have Sam Carter write it in the UNATCO notes? That's what I meant.

_________________
GMDX: Advancement Mod


Last edited by Cybernetic pig on Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:33 am
Profile
UNATCO
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:54 pm
Posts: 214
Post Re: Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properti
The UNATCO personnel never use it , so yes , you can say that it's experimental

_________________
Being a soldier isn't just following orders, it's following those orders in the service of a higher cause. When that cause is betrayed, we're not soldiers anymore, just pieces on a chess board dying for the wrong reason.


Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:35 am
Profile
Illuminati

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:21 am
Posts: 2283
Post Re: Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properti
No, there is no disputing it. An email, the weapons' description and more already state it is experimental. But is it necessary to have Sam Carter be a pedant about in the weapon mod descriptions too? Military guys often abbreviate, for instance. People leave out details intentionally or unintentionally sometimes. It can fit his character.

Fixing it is something I don't see as absolutely necessary, is what I'm saying.

_________________
GMDX: Advancement Mod


Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:45 am
Profile
UNATCO
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:54 pm
Posts: 214
Post Re: Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properti
If they want to further market this weapon by labeling that it's a prototype , then sure, why not

_________________
Being a soldier isn't just following orders, it's following those orders in the service of a higher cause. When that cause is betrayed, we're not soldiers anymore, just pieces on a chess board dying for the wrong reason.


Tue Dec 13, 2016 7:48 am
Profile
NSF
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 86
Location: between your synaptic gap
Post More grave stuff to get done.
I. You are welcome, as always.
II. & III. & IV. I had the same issue pondering about ultra-high carbon stainless steel knives. I keep forgetting that this game is set almost fourty years from today. I would and I did not change anything, so there is nothing to change. In all, I agree with Cybernetic Pig's last post.

There is more stuff to fix, though:

[WeaponModAccuracy] and [WeaponModSilencer] shares the same UNATCO OPS FILE NOTE number: SC108-BLUE.
WeaponModAccuracy wrote:
<UNATCO OPS FILE NOTE SC108-BLUE> Almost any weapon that has a significant amount of vibration can be modified with a balancer; I've even seen it work with the mini-crossbow and a prototype plasma gun. -- Sam Carter <END NOTE>
WeaponModSilencer wrote:
<UNATCO OPS FILE NOTE SC108-BLUE> Obviously, a silencer is only effective with firearms. -- Sam Carter <END NOTE>
Same stuff with [AugDatalink] and [AugHeartLung], they share the same UNATCO OPS FILE NOTE number: JR133-VIOLET.
AugDatalink wrote:
<UNATCO OPS FILE NOTE JR133-VIOLET> This is top of the line all the way, so don't expect any upgrades. -- Jaime Reyes <END NOTE>
AugHeartLung wrote:
<UNATCO OPS FILE NOTE JR133-VIOLET> However, this will not enhance any augmentation past its maximum upgrade level. -- Jaime Reyes <END NOTE>
I quickly double-checked all the other UNATCO OPS FILE NOTES and I was not able to find any dupes other than those above.
AugmentationCannister wrote:
An augmentation canister teems with nanoscale mecanocarbon ROM modules suspended in a carrier serum.
Should be mechanocarbon.


Tue Dec 13, 2016 8:00 am
Profile
NSF
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 3:24 pm
Posts: 86
Location: between your synaptic gap
Post Re: Has anyone ever proofread/modded the DX weapons properti
Bump.
WeaponModLaser wrote:
A laser targeting dot eliminates any inaccuracy resulting from the inability to visually guage a projectile's point of impact.
Should be gauge.


Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:04 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.