Page 2 of 2

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:18 am
by Mr_Cyberpunk
they're minor spoilers and do very little to the plot IMO. It was a really dumb ending tbh.

AC Rev's ending is a hell lot better I wouldn't dare spoil it.

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:16 pm
by Jonas
Wow I totally and utterly forgot that that happened. Just had to go to YouTube and watch the ending to see, and yeah, I remember it now.

Carry on then.

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:08 pm
by Jaedar
When revolutions spoiled it for me I went, what wait, why?

It still didn't make sense to me, even after I looked it up on youtube.
Mr_Cyberpunk wrote:l Reason: Ubisoft couldn't pay her voice actor anymore. (but in all fairness I don't mind her, she's a good actress, she was just underused- so much potential wasted IMO).
But now it makes sense

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:31 pm
by nerdenstein
Don't Spoil Revelations please! :shock:
Lucy is not a Templar. Lucy is not a Templar. ](*,)

Damn, I really want to play it but this week is such a bummer for college work and with ME3 coming out on Friday, it'll be ages before I do. :x

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:47 pm
by Grammatolatry
Lucy being a Templar is just a theory.

New assassin is hawt! But...Connor? And an axe? And that stupid feather!

And why did Desmond get so damn fat in revelations?

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 8:28 am
by nerdenstein
I know, I just don't want it too be true. :P
But from what Subject 16 said in the truth and Minerva said at the end, it is likely that she is of Templar decent. Perhaps she was killed because she was the last member of a tainted bloodline of Assassin-Templars.

Theory stands that Desmond is one of the last people who came before so Minerva wouldn't want that bloodline tainted if Desmond and Lucy had a kid; which has also been hinted at in Brotherhood I think.

Re: Assassin's Creed III! Warghblarghagahblaaaa!

Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:29 am
by Mr_Cyberpunk
CG Trailer for AC3 was predictable but intrigued me with how they're allowing you to climb vegitation- that should be pretty epic! But the whole Washington thing shits me off.. Damn it, can we get at least one game where he's not depicted in the same light as Braveheart. (I also disliked the slaughter of red coats, the indians were neutrals, ideally he should be killing both sides in the trailer.) Further more, Washington was a freemason (Templar)... so technically he's a bad guy in this. (I'd love to know how they'll deal with this.. I hope it won't be some copout that Freemasonry is different from Templarism.. because its not! its based on the exact same teachings. (Modern Templar are just a spinoff of freemasons)). I'd love it if it turned out that the Assasins are actually the bad guys :D.

Lots of questions that need to be answered. I'm looking forward to seeing the game, could be pretty fun.

Purely speculation, nothing to do with spoilers.